At 00:27 26-03-2008, Bill Manning wrote: > what this daft is trying to do is force the presumptive > existance of an MX in a zone into an explict rule that > forces the existance of an MX, else SMTP fails. That's not what Section 5.1 (Locating the Target Host) of the draft says. At 19:31 25-03-2008, Bill Manning wrote: >example.com. soa ( > stuff > ) > > ns foo. > ns bar. >; >mailhost aaaa fe80::21a:92ff:fe99:2ab1 > > is what i am using today. The above will work. This is considered as a MX with a preference of 0 pointing to mailhost.example.com. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf