> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:00:23AM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote: > > Ned Freed wrote: > > > > > If the consensus is that better interoperability can be had > > > by banning bare AAAA records that's perfectly fine with me. > > > > FWIW, I'd like that... > > > > >> Clarity can be established and interoperability _improved_ > > >> by limiting discovery to just A and MX records. Perhaps a > > >> note might be included that at some point in the future MX > > >> records may become required. > > > > > Again, I have no problem with this approach if that's what > > > the consensus is. > > > > ...and that, too. > > so what is supposed to happen when I remove all > "A" RR's from my zones? The same thing that happens today with zones that don't have A records. You use MX records to refer to machines that have address (A and/or AAAA) records. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf