Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Title: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet

It occurs to me that a protocol of this type might well have been used to effect by the recently reired governor of a nearby state to ensure that his communications were in strict compliance with certain regulations that enforce certain geographic routing restrictions.

Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Fred Baker [mailto:fred@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Thursday, March 13, 2008 03:58 PM Pacific Standard Time
To:     Bernard Aboba
Cc:     ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject:        Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Mar 13, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:

> The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has further compounded 
> the problem by creating interoperable standards for security, which 
> have enabled hosts on the Internet to protect traffic end-to-end or 
> hop-by-hop. This has not only harmed vendor profitability by 
> requiring vendors to interoperate with each other, but by enabling 
> users to take ownership of their own security without the approval 
> of operators or governmental authorities, criminal activity, 
> terrorism, and juvenile delinquincy have flourished.
>
> While these issues have long been recognized by the U.N. Working 
> Group on Internet Governance, until recently, the IETF has shown 
> little interest in solving these problems.

I'm hoping this comment is tongue-in-cheek.

If not, I'd encourage you to review http://www.arcchart.com/blueprint/
show.asp?id=428. I'll quote its final paragraph here:

> The culmination of attractive data pricing, improved usability and 
> mobile demand for Web 2.0 services, together with increased 
> availability of 3G devices is brewing to form the prefect data 
> storm – a tipping point where the majority of a subscriber base 
> accesses the data network with regularity. This is something which 
> operators like Vodafone have fought hard to achieve but, while they 
> have deployed the networks and supplied the devices, it is not 
> their walled-gardens or headline-grabbing media partnerships which 
> are causing the data winds to blow. It is the likes of MySpace, 
> Facebook, Google, Flickr, Jaiku, YouTube and Flirtomatic which are 
> seeding the stirring clouds. As data pricing erodes along the same 
> path travelled by voice, operators must now identify ways to tap 
> into revenues from web services or else be left exposed when the 
> data hurricane arrives.
>


In essence, it reviews Vodaphone's semi-annual numeric announcement 
in November, and concludes that the growth of Vodaphone - which is 
very nice, includes a 7% increase in voice revenue, a 9% increase in 
SMS revenue, and 49% growth in data revenue, the vast majority of 
which does not derive from Vodaphone's walled garden. One data point 
is just that - anecdotal evidence. But it points in a direction that 
market research analysts throughout the industry (such as were 
discussed in Marshall Eubank's talk this evening) are also pointing.

Since when are walled garden vendors (like I-Mode, which failed as a 
business last year after delivering one of the most-used walled 
gardens to date) shooting any feet but their own in promoting walled 
gardens?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFH2bEZbjEdbHIsm0MRAoCzAKCSxjy+SRxb+7boVMQp/mLO5+ZfuwCfeNWF
iskKt86Jdcc5vXSWTiro3vk=
=wLPp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]