Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1

On Mar 13, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has further compounded  > the problem by creating interoperable standards for security, which  > have enabled hosts on the Internet to protect traffic end-to-end or  > hop-by-hop. This has not only harmed vendor profitability by  > requiring vendors to interoperate with each other, but by enabling  > users to take ownership of their own security without the approval  > of operators or governmental authorities, criminal activity,  > terrorism, and juvenile delinquincy have flourished.>> While these issues have long been recognized by the U.N. Working  > Group on Internet Governance, until recently, the IETF has shown  > little interest in solving these problems.
I'm hoping this comment is tongue-in-cheek.
If not, I'd encourage you to review http://www.arcchart.com/blueprint/ show.asp?id=428. I'll quote its final paragraph here:
> The culmination of attractive data pricing, improved usability and  > mobile demand for Web 2.0 services, together with increased  > availability of 3G devices is brewing to form the prefect data  > storm – a tipping point where the majority of a subscriber base  > accesses the data network with regularity. This is something which  > operators like Vodafone have fought hard to achieve but, while they  > have deployed the networks and supplied the devices, it is not  > their walled-gardens or headline-grabbing media partnerships which  > are causing the data winds to blow. It is the likes of MySpace,  > Facebook, Google, Flickr, Jaiku, YouTube and Flirtomatic which are  > seeding the stirring clouds. As data pricing erodes along the same  > path travelled by voice, operators must now identify ways to tap  > into revenues from web services or else be left exposed when the  > data hurricane arrives.>

In essence, it reviews Vodaphone's semi-annual numeric announcement  in November, and concludes that the growth of Vodaphone - which is  very nice, includes a 7% increase in voice revenue, a 9% increase in  SMS revenue, and 49% growth in data revenue, the vast majority of  which does not derive from Vodaphone's walled garden. One data point  is just that - anecdotal evidence. But it points in a direction that  market research analysts throughout the industry (such as were  discussed in Marshall Eubank's talk this evening) are also pointing.
Since when are walled garden vendors (like I-Mode, which failed as a  business last year after delivering one of the most-used walled  gardens to date) shooting any feet but their own in promoting walled  gardens?-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFH2bEZbjEdbHIsm0MRAoCzAKCSxjy+SRxb+7boVMQp/mLO5+ZfuwCfeNWFiskKt86Jdcc5vXSWTiro3vk==wLPp-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----_______________________________________________IETF mailing listIETF@xxxxxxxxxxxxx://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]