At 5:48 PM -0800 3/6/08, Cullen Jennings wrote: > >I put that in before the IESG call where this document was on the >Agenda - This was put in as the document editor, Ted in this case, had >asked me not to put in a discuss until we tried to figure out a way to >resolve this that did it without opening too many old wounds (this WG >has plenty of wounds). Ted sent me the text before the call (he send >it Tuesday) - I should have updated the discuss before the call this >morning however for some odd reason there have been some other things >using up my time this week. I have now updated the discuss and removed >this part as I should have done this morning. For the record, I suggested we talk after Cullen DEFERed on the previous telechat to see whether it was a misunderstanding on his part, rather than a serious issue. It was later that I suggested someone else hold the discuss, because I thought Cullen would want to recuse, since he is a patent author on a patent his company has filed related to this document. Given that I have now seen the discuss text, I can see that he has managed to open the old ones, bring in ones from a related working group that aren't really salient, and open significant new ones, all without having paid much attention to all of the text and effort that flowed in the attempt to get early discussion of this. To quote ekr, "Outstanding!" Ted Hardie _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf