On 4 mar 2008, at 16.32, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> I also found the tone of the original paper insulting. I don't think
> that 'send text' is an acceptable response to such objections.
For the specific issue, the lack of correct history of why people did
select TXT RR Types my conclusion was that some new added text was
needed that described it. For that specific issue, I felt "send text"
was the correct response.
Patrik
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf