The IAB tracker indicated this document was dead, now we are told that publication is imminent. Why?
Do we get to ask the author to address the other proposals that have been made to address this issue (XPTR) or does it just get published regardless of whether the claims made are true or not?
I also found the tone of the original paper insulting. I don't think that 'send text' is an acceptable response to such objections. If the author cannot respond to real operational objections that have been raised without condescension then someone else should write the paper or the paper should not be published at all.
I am happy to restate my objections, but not if they are going to be ignored yet again.
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of Patrik Fältström
Sent: Tue 04/03/2008 9:30 AM
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer
Cc: Mark Andrews; ietf@xxxxxxxx; iab@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
On 4 mar 2008, at 15.13, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> But I regret that the choices of the TXT users are
> misrepresented as pure stupidity.
As often said in the IETF: "Send text".
I.e. suggest text that you think one can get consensus on.
Patrik
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf