John: > > Timing did not allow this approach. Registration for this > > meeting is being handled by AMS, our new Secretariat vendor. > > However, we needed to open registration for this meeting > > before ietf.org was moved from the old Secretariat vendor to > > the new one. This approach seemed like the best way to deal > > with the transition. > >Taking this as a given, can we be assured that future meetings >will be handled exclusively from ietf.org? If so, then I think >we should, to the extent possible, write the issues with the >amsl.com certification off as a transition issue and move on. >If not, I would think that this discussion ought to expand into >examining the question of whether the example IETF sets ought to >involve certificate authorities and types that actually verify >an organization's identity and status, not just the ability to >obtain a domain name and set up a web site. I'm investigating. If I have not reported an answer by the IESG/IAOC plenary at IETF 71, then please ask. Russ _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf