Timing did not allow this approach. Registration for this meeting is being handled by AMS, our new Secretariat vendor. However, we needed to open registration for this meeting before ietf.org was moved from the old Secretariat vendor to the new one. This approach seemed like the best way to deal with the transition. Russ At 12:05 PM 2/21/2008, SM wrote: >At 07:22 21-02-2008, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >So, what puzzles me here is: > >Why is this going to amsl.com at all? It seems extremely > >desirable to have a set of names and credentials that point > >only to *ietf.org, both to keep interfaces consistent and > >to avoid issues with referential integrity in future > >transitions. > >Good question. It would have been better to have the registration >site under *.ietf.org instead of being directed to a third-party >site. It may inspire more confidence. > >Regards, >-sm > >_______________________________________________ >IETF mailing list >IETF@xxxxxxxx >http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf