On Wed Feb 20 20:26:14 2008, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 05:23:52PM +0000, > lconroy <lconroy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote a message of 23 lines > which said: > > > So what the heck is wrong with UK (as in the country code TLD of > the > > same name), > > It's true that there is a discrepancy between ISO 3166 and the root > of > the DNS. Do not worry, David Conrad, IANA, reads this list and he > will > certainly resolve the discrepancy today by renaming the TLD ".uk" to > ".gb". In case anyone hasn't understood why the choice of GB as a country-code for the UK is somewhat contentious to some people, it's that "Great Britain" is [the island containing] Scotland, England, and Wales, whereas the country itself is called "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". Whilst I follow the decision of avoiding "United" and "Kingdom" within country-codes, the resulting choice is unfortunate for people on either side of Northern Irish politics, since GB either excludes Northern Ireland, or else implicitly convolves it with the rest of the UK, depending on one's viewpoint. Whilst that's not a debate I take sides in, to many people this is an important and sensitive issue. The solution is usually to hide country codes from the user (using country names instead), or allow UK and translate it internally. Personally, I just use AQ for marketing forms, and often wonder how they handle that. Dave. -- Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx - xmpp:dwd@xxxxxxxxxx - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/ - http://dave.cridland.net/ Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf