PTR for IPv6 clients (Re: IPv6 NAT?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Andrews skrev:
>>
>
> You also don't want to do it as you would also need massive churn in
> the DNS.
>
> Microsoft gets this wrong as they don't register the privacy addresses
> in the DNS which in turn causes services to be blocked because there
> is no address in the DNS.
perhaps the advent of IPv6 will result in people finally (*finally*)
giving up on this sorry excuse for a security blanket? (calling it a
"mechanism" is too kind)

Or perhaps it'll just make people register wildcard records at the /64
level in ip6.arpa :-(

             Harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (MY, what an useful
reverse map!)


_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]