Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:50:10PM -0500,
 John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 59 lines which said:

> 	* This ISO 3166 code business, rather than, e.g., a
> 	country name.

While a country name is more intuitive and certainly better for a
general Web site, it seems safe to assume that IETF members are a bit
more used to standards than the general population and that ergonomics
of this field may not be the most important thing to discuss?

A partial list of standards track RFC referencing ISO 3166:

4933
4776
4646
4524
4517
3982
...

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]