On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 03:42:43PM +0100, Rémi Després <remi.despres@xxxxxxx> wrote a message of 49 lines which said: > A similar result could be achieved if resolvers, when they have to > get a name for an IPv6 address having a privacy ID, instead of > having no chance to get any name, would replace this ID by an agreed > standard value for which there is a PTR RR. It seems a good idea. RFC 1101 is probably the right basis for such a feature (which does not exist today). So, the roadmap is: * write a RFC 1101bis, mostly to introduce IPv6 support * convince the resolver's authors to use it (it requires code on their side) _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf