On 14 feb 2008, at 21:49, Florian Weimer wrote: > The prevailing assumption is that IPv6 end nodes will be globally > addressable for practical purporses. I think this is a very unlikely > outcome. Are you saying that there will be IPv6 NAT? And that we should design protocols running on top of IPv6 to take NAT into account? If yes on both, how can we do that without a NAT specification so that the IETF can design protocols to work with NAT and vendors can build NATs that work with IETF protocols? I.e., either we assume no NAT in IPv6, or create a NAT standard. Those are the only sane options. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf