Hi all, Some of the reviews I have seen start with good things to say about the document pointing about a few things that need to be fixed. Yoshi pointed out one issue that he apparently missed during the WGLC. We have been going back and forth on these topics and not really making progress. Many, if not most of the folks, are also active in the HOKEY WG and support the charter. Let us get together on a telecon sometime next week, and resolve these pending issues. I will send an offline request so we can figure out a time that works for all of us. Thanks. I have seen one comment so far which declares clear opposition. I am going to respond to that separately. regards, Lakshminath On 2/3/2008 1:14 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: > Dan Harkins wrote: >> Yea, mapping by Username might be better. Oone reason is that you >> could develop a rational searching strategy to identify keys if you >> indexed with something like "Username". That is a great suggestion and >> a useful alternative to what is in the draft now. I would support such >> a change. > > It is also existing practice. The term "hotlining" refers to the > process of pro-actively kicking a user offline after they have > previously been authenticated. > > ERX has to be able to support this practice. It has to be able to > delete *all* keys associated with a particular user/cui/session, so that > those keys can no longer be used to obtain network access. > > Alan DeKok. > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf