Re: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-00.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 3:52 AM +0100 1/18/08, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Or maybe TAO is the IETF "user manual" and public FAQ, while IONs
not limited to Procdoc are the "reference manual" for folks trying
to figure out why "user manual" and "implementation" are different.

Something along that line, yes. The Tao really should be an RFC, which means that it will go out of date regularly. Its intended audience is quite different than IETF regulars who would read IONs.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]