Re: Additional Key words to Indicate Requirement Levels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 10:41 15-01-2008, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Greetings again. A few Internet Drafts are starting to adopt the MUST- / SHOULD+ / SHOULD- terminology from RFC 4307. So that people can point to stand-alone definitions, I created a small draft. From the announcement:

These new requirement levels might serve as a crystal ball as to the direction the specifications are expected to follow. That might be perceived by some as a valid reason whether to implement a recommendation or not.

In the context of RFC 4307, these terms make sense. If the terms were generalized, they might be used to impose a particular recommendation without any elaboration from the author.

Regards,
-sm

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]