Re: Last-Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> 	I know this is a bit late but:
> 
> 	Section 5.1's sythesis of MX records based on the presence of
> 	AAAA records is a bad idea.
> 
>    If no MX records are found, but an address
>    RR (i.e., either an IPv4 A RR or an IPv6 AAAA RR, or their
>    successors) is found, the address RR is treated as if it was
>    associated with an implicit MX RR, with a preference of 0, pointing
>    to that host.  
> 
> 	Synthesizing a MX record on NODATA to a MX lookup and a
> 	subsequent successful AAAA lookup is bad engineering decision.
> 	It will work reasonably well for IPv4 only + dual stack
> 	envirionment.  It will not work well for IPv4 only + dual
> 	stack + IPv6 only envirionment.
>   
>         The reason it is a bad engineering decision is that:
>   
> 	* the IPv4 only world needs a MX RRSet to find a dual stack
> 	  MTA to relay into the IPv6 network.
>   
>         * the IPv6 world has a raft of solutions which will allow it
>           to initiate a connection to a IPv4 only MTA without having
>           to find a dual stack MX for the target mail domain.
>   
>         * it changes the definition of what it means to exist in
>           the mail domain and you will have different MTA/MSA making
>           different existance decisions.  Some will say that AAAA +
>           no MX exist but others will say that the site does not
>           exist.
> 
> 	e.g.
> 	a new (IPv6 aware) MSA which is configured to relay through
> 	a old (non-AAAA aware) MTA on its outward bound path.
>   
>         Do you really thing we should be trying to force a upgrade
>         of all MTA's on the planet to support MX synthesis from
>         AAAA when there is no engineering need to to this?
>   
>         MX from A was a transition strategy.  IPv6 only sites have a
>         transition strategy that doesn't require synthesis.  It is
>         advertise a dual stack MX.  At some point in the future sites
>         will stop having a dual stack MX, the same way they stopped
>         adding A records for mail only domains back in the 90's.
> 
> 	Mark

	It should be noted that direct to address for IPv4 or IPv6
	addesses is reasonable when there isn't any appropriate
	records (MX, A or AAAA) in the DNS and the MTA is configured
	to use /etc/host, NIS etc.

	Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]