> -----Original Message----- > From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > The first of the two comments below is probably > primarily the IESG's concern, although it affects the IETF last call. > The second comment is a more general issue. > > Comments: > This document requests assignment of a Diameter Command Code. > As this requires "IETF Consensus" additional care may > be needed to ensure that the Last Call produces clarity on > the required consensus. > It would seem appropriate for the last call announcement to > have indicated this requirement. It is difficult to claim > "IETF Consensus" > from the typical non-response to IETF last call for > informational documents. > Hi Joel, Thank you for catching this. I have required the Secretariat to re-issue the Last Call with the clarification of the issue you are pointing to. Dan _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf