On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 09:42:14AM -0800, TS Glassey wrote: > So then Ted isnt the IETF WG list isnt the place where matters without a WG > are discussed? Is that true? Seems to me that the IETF cannot do that > without creating a new home for projects without a WG. The IPR WG does exist. So discussions about IPR-related matters should be taken there. If they, however, decide that they don't need to define a term like "Sponsor", and rule it out of scope on for the IPR working group, that doesn't mean that it is fair game for the IETF list. Regards, - Ted _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf