Re: dkim sign ietf lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Russ Housley wrote:
I meant let's hold off until the transition is complete. I did not mean to confuse.

Sorry I wasn't clear. I really did understand your note (and although my opnion doesn't matter about such things, I'll add that I entirely agree with yourjudicious operations management.)

Rather, I was weakly attempting to be ironic, by implying a distinction between the recommendation in your note in this thread, versus choosing to disrupt the plenary with a different kind of unfamiliar change...

d/

ps. (I'm in a post-scripting mood today.) The ensuing discussion about v6 testing has been enlightening and I hope that we really do have a dedicated timeslot at the next (and next and next and...) IETF for working on end-to-end v6 scenarios that work when mobile.

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]