On Aug 24, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Cullen Jennings wrote:
I think a much better design would be one that supported many
protocols
and took advantage of the flexibility or URIs instead of just
jabber -
for example a header that looked like
IMPP: xmpp:juliet@xxxxxxxxxxx
Another approach, naturally, would be to define a header field for
including an im: URI and/or one for including a pres: URI. That seems
fairly straightforward.
Peter
Sure - that works for me too.
BTW - I do like the basic idea of the draft - I just prefer the more
general form of it.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf