> > /48 PA assignments to the customer is sufficient. > > for roaming clients (like travelling laptops with PPP) there's a > > different requirement. > > > IMHO even a traveling laptop with PPP needs to be able to subnet. > I've lost count of the number of times I've needed to do this in IPv4 > but been stuck with a single /32. I have also lost count of the number > of times I've used a laptop as a router in the days when I had a /28 > routed to me. Built in NAT capability for IPv4 that allows a single PPP > connection to be shared over wireless seems fairly common these days. > We need the equivalent capability in IPv6, just without NAT. agreed, like your laptop providing connectivity for your music player (like iPod), SIP-ready phone (like Symbian phones) and such. the internet infrastructure should keep options open for the other industry player to play with. itojun _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf