> I think that those who believe v6 DHCP and auto-conf are sufficient to > avoid the PI or local-autonomy requirement are deluding themselves, > but one cannot prove such propositions until it is too late to prevent > the undesired outcome. > > Counter-arguments? from realworld experience in providing IPv6 services at an ISP, and as a customer of that service: /48 PA assignments to the customer is sufficient. for roaming clients (like travelling laptops with PPP) there's a different requirement. anyone who would like to comment on this topic should better have real experience in assigning prefixes to the customers :-P itojun # ipv6samurais.com: saving the world with code and sword _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf