Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Noel Chiappa wrote:
>     > From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>     > what we really need is a layer of indirection at the BGP level so that
>     > sites can have stable addresses without having to NAT.
>
> You mean, have a namespace for use by the path-selection algorithms, one
> which is separate from the namespace used for end-end naming?
>
> That's a really good idea; too bad we didn't think of it in time to suggest
> it to the IPv6 designers, it would have been really nice to have that in IPv6.
>   
actually I think it can be done without changes to IPv6, since it
doesn't affect the packet format, and the only things that have to know
about it are routers and network management tools.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]