>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Rescorla <ekr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Eric> Well, the difference is in part the IESG note. More
Eric> importantly, the question is whether the IESG intends to
Eric> hold future work to the requirements in this document. If
Eric> they do, then this document needs significantly more review
Eric> and a much stronger showing of consensus. Arguably, if they
Eric> do it should be required to be PS or BCP.
Obviously as an individual, I disagree that it would be necessary for
significantly more review to take place.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf