Re: Informational vs. Informational

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> writes:

    Paul> On a thread about a specific document that is proposed to be
    Paul> an Informational RFC coming through the IETF process:

    Paul> At 1:12 PM -0400 8/20/07, Sam Hartman wrote:
    >> I've asked the sponsoring AD to make a consensus call on
    >> whether we have sufficient support to be making this sort of
    >> statement.  If not, then I'll be happy to take my document to
    >> the rfc editor.

    Paul> This is pointless. No one other than an expert at the IETF
    Paul> process could differentiate between the two types of
    Paul> Informational RFCs in RFC repository (and many IETF process
    Paul> experts would not get it right on the first try). An
    Paul> Informational RFC is an Informational RFC regardless of the
    Paul> path that got it published.

The difference is the IESG note.  I respect your belief that many
people would not understand that difference.

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]