Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Tom.Petch wrote:
Certainly there were early prototypes of OSI modules, and even running
products.
...

OSI got well beyond the prototype stage.  Major manufacturers produced products
and I was involved with their implementation.

So did minor manufacturers. We (Wollongong) developed and sold a full OSI stack, from clnp up through x.400. that's why I said "running products". At base, however, such products were purchased more as a checklist item than for real use.

My point was about the failure to make sure there was large-scale, multi-vendor, in-the-wild *service*. Anything that constraint what can go wrong will limit the ability to make the technology robust and usable.

It is the focus on pragmatic steps that make the technology usable that I believe Clark was referring to, by saying "running code".

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]