RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Add a warning note

Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications
404-847-6397
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
ned+dkim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 3:03 PM
To: Tony Hansen
Cc: Apps Discuss; IETF General Discussion Mailing List;
ietf-dkim@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call

> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> > I share your concerns about removing rules that are already in use
--
> > that would generally be a bad thing.  However I'm interested in the
> > consensus around whether a warning or a deprecation statement would
be a
> > good thing.

> LWSP has a valid meaning and use, and its being misapplied somewhere
> doesn't make that meaning and usage invalid. I could see a note being
> added. However, anything more than that is totally inappropriate.

Full agreement with Tony here.

				Ned
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]