Re: administrative question on RFC publications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



God I HATE Microsoft tools -
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "todd glassey" <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Jefsey Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx>; <ipr-wg@xxxxxxxx>;
<ietf-pkix-request@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: administrative question on RFC publications


> Jefsey - good question - can an RFC or other document be published by the
> Editor's when an appeal pertains to it? - From a copyright question I
would
> say the organizational answer to this should be "No, that any
administrative
> actions regarding a submission to the Publication Desk should stay any
> further action on that/those submissions pending resolution(s) of the
> complaint/matters."
>
> Anyone else have commentary on this? These are important issues of both
the
> RFC Editor's operations and IPR management and how the release process and
> anyone contesting it may act so this is also posted to IPR-WG
>
> Todd
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jefsey Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <rfc-editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 8:19 AM
> Subject: administrative question on RFC publications
>
>
> > Dear RFC Editor,
> > A few months ago I proposed that the RFC 3066 Bis would be speeded up
> > to get the RFC number 4466 (in line with an IETF tradition). I was
> > explained that one cannot expedite one particular RFC publishing
> > process, by-passing and delaying all the others. Is that exact?
> >
> > If I ask it is because I announced an appeal against a BCP 47 Draft
> > in the coming weeks: we want to prepare it carefully. The matter at
> > hand is important and we will most probably have to escalate the
> > appeal to the IAB. We felt there was no hurry due to the rank of its
> > three Drafts on the RFC line, and no harm since authors chose a BCP
> > because BCP Drafts are immediately applied when approved. (IANA
> > applied it partly, IESG not).
> >
> > However, if there was a way to by-pass the normal process to please
> > the authors, and due to the important external interests and who are
> > the involved stakeholders, I would certainly be glad to speed up the
> > process, killing a few vacation days of my team. All the more than I
> > am sure the IESG and the IAB  would also be ready to do the same. The
> > question is only: is this feasible?
> >
> > Also, can the RFC be published while there is an IESG or an IAB
> > appeal being considered?
> > I thank you for your response.
> > jfc
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]