Dear Harald,
its seems that you are rewriting History (past and future) in the
same funny way as before (eg. your PR-action letter). BTW I am happy
to learn I am only suspended for 6 months from the obsolete
ietf-languages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx One month to go then.
Look, you have used RFC 3683 to DoS me, prevent the use of the
"en-eu" langtag, make the IESG violate the WG-LTRU workable consensus
I wanted and obtained, and confuse many to enforce your vision of the
IETF. This RFC 3935 of yours vision where leaders like you make
decisions to "influence the way the people design, use, and manage
the Internet".
This was a cute trick. Making the most important architectural issue
addressed through a confuse ad-hominem. Protecting your lobby from
having to answer any technical point. But I am afraid this mostly
disserved your positions. This is not the place for me to dwell on
it. But we all experience that it hurts the IETF's credibility in the
linguistic and political areas. Is that what you want? I do not.
I only want:
- interoperability between your UNICODE system for the IANA and the
rest of our world,
- independence for the IANA without having to look for your "somewhere else",
- and the IETF to differentiate the English Globalization and
Multilingualisation architectural layers.
or the IAB to say they do not want it. To document the http://bcp47.org site.
If you want me to pursue on the way you impose me, I will. However,
is it your best interest? I will most probably continue to win, while
we should agree and work together. Your decision anyway.
jfc
At 15:30 10/08/2006, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
I regard a 6-month ritual of:
1) Unsuspending Jefsey from ietf-languages
2) Waiting until Jefsey discovers his unsuspension
3) Wading through Jefsey posts until everyone's sure he's still as
incomprehensible as before
4) Convincing my then-current AD that it's time for another 6-month suspension
5) Suspending Jefsey for another 6 months
6) Dealing with his appeal of the suspension to the AD
7) Dealing with his appeal of the suspension to the IESG
8) Dealing with his appeal of the suspension to the IAB
9) Dealing with his appeal of the violation of his human rights to
the ISOC BoD
as a silly waste of energy, an affront to people's sanity, and
harmful to the IETF.
draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment has been approved for 2 months
at this point. While it disallows procedures that suspend people
beyond November 2007, a procedure authorized under that umbrella
would be a much better first step.
Don't throw away the umbrella because you're buying a raincoat next
week. It's still raining.
Harald
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
This is a personal draft written following some discussion
in the recent General Area open meeting. Comments welcome.
I am already aware that it needs to be reconciled with
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/STATEMENTS/statement-disruptive-posting.txt
Brian
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:50:01 -0400
From: Internet-Drafts@xxxxxxxx
Reply-To: internet-drafts@xxxxxxxx
To: i-d-announce@xxxxxxxx
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions
Author(s) : B. Carpenter
Filename : draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt
Pages : 5
Date : 2006-8-9
This document abolishes the existing form of indefinite Posting
Rights Action and restores the previous option of finite posting
rights suspensions authorized by an Area Director. It obsoletes RFC
3683 and updates RFC 2418 and RFC 3934.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf