Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Because the IESG believed that specifying an image format > as an audio subtype was to be discouraged, but should be documented > for reference. Historically, "documenting for reference" produces an Informational status, rather than Historic. >From RFC 2026: > 4.2.2 Informational > > An "Informational" specification is published for the general > information of the Internet community, and does not represent an > Internet community consensus or recommendation. Why the change for this document? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf