FWIW - (I have an idea about recreating the peer-based standards process to
not only build oversight into it to prevent one set of peers from
interfering with another set of peers efforts, something that runs rampant
in this IETF and causes tremendous damage to some initiatives, but a process
that WILL lead to more IETF standards for the Trust to hawk.)
if... Someone were to propose a project to the IESG under the IETF's IP
ownership controls, and in the process were to define:
1) Those vetting the technologies - and their roles in the vetting
process
What was to constitute proper vetting - and how it were to be
recorded
2) Those performing the prototyping of the properties
Identifying in the Project Plan who was going to do the physical
ports and a commitment from the Sponsors to make that happen.
3) and the plans for the project were all laid out... including the
test, interoperability and otherwise technologies
would the IESG protect this initiative and allow it to be started and
completed? This is a totally reasonable question about the IESG and what it
needs to control.
Todd Glassey
----- Original Message -----
From: "John C Klensin" <john-ietf@xxxxxxx>
To: "Todd Glassey" <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Brian E Carpenter"
<brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Leslie Daigle" <leslie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "IETF Administrative Director"
<iad@xxxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; "Allison Mankin" <mankin@xxxxxxx>;
<iaoc@xxxxxxxx>; "Ted Hardie" <hardie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
>
>
> --On Thursday, 27 July, 2006 11:04 -0700 Todd Glassey
> <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > JCK
> > Lets ask Jorge if the Final RFP is different from interim
> > RFP's then dont all parties have to be given proper review and
> > response time to the final version? lest they recieve less
> > access or are not favorites in the bidding-contract
> > acquisition process?
>
> Todd, I think you are wasting everyone's time here. There are
> no "interim RFPs", there are merely drafts for [IETF] community
> review and comments. I presume that, once the final RFP is
> issued (July 31 is the current target if I remember the
> schedule), all parties will have until the submission deadline
> to do whatever they will do with it. Clearly, if the final RFP
> were issued, and then some update were to appear in mid-August
> that changed the terms and conditions in a significant way, that
> would be bad news. But I don't think anyone has proposed that.
>
> john
>
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf