Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Given the number of different working groups that have produced diffiult to read documents for RFC publication, the indications are that we are missing some necessary ingredient for achieving this within the working group process. I do not know if we lack the skills, incentives, or resources, but history indicates that we frequently have produced documents that still need significant editing. While having a goal of improving this makes good sense, I think we need to work from the WG end, not the editor end. Until we are producing better results, we can not cut down on the editing process.

Yours,
Joel M. Halpern

At 08:04 PM 7/22/2006, Dave Crocker wrote:
What I HAVE said is that the process of getting and demonstrating sufficient
community support should include requiring acceptable writing of the
specifications. If an effort is not able to recruit sufficient resources for
that task, then I frankly question whether it has sufficient market "pull" to
succeed.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]