Definitively there are several countries: Spain, Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, Panama. Regards, Jordi > De: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Responder a: <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> > Fecha: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:54:16 -0700 > Para: <jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > Asunto: Re: Meetings in other regions > > JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: >> There are two issues: >> >> 1) Cost. IETF has limited resources, so unless each of us want to pay more >> and more for the registration fees or we are able to compensate the cost >> with more sponsors (which is every day more difficult), we need to look for >> cheaper locations. >> >> 2) Is un fair that the main driver is only looking at where more people >> comes from (this is fortunately changing anyway, and thus will less and less >> easy to match). Even worst if that's a country with doesn't allow everyone >> to come in. > > So where is this mythical low cost easy to travel to country within > easy reach of an untapped resource of potential ietf participants? > > Once we've located it, it should be easy for the IAD to book us a hotel > on the dates we've fixed in stone 2 years in advance... > >> Regards, >> Jordi >> >> >> >> >>> De: Scott W Brim <swb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Organización: Cisco Systems, Inc. >>> Responder a: <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> >>> Fecha: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:14:34 -0400 >>> Para: Fred Baker <fred@xxxxxxxxx> >>> CC: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, <dassa@xxxxxxx> >>> Asunto: Re: Meetings in other regions >>> >>> On 07/14/2006 10:01 AM, Fred Baker allegedly wrote: >>>> Once upon a time, >>>> the guideline I followed was that about 1/6 of the IETF was from Europe, >>>> a smattering was from elsewhere, and the lion's share was from the US, >>>> so I scheduled a meeting every other year in Europe, the odd one in >>>> random places, and the lion's share in the US. Those statistics are >>>> essentially meaningless now. >>> Why are they meaningless? The IETF should overwhelmingly meet where >>> the participants are, wherever that might be. I still like your >>> algorithm. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ietf mailing list >>> Ietf@xxxxxxxx >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> >> >> >> >> ********************************************** >> The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org >> >> Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! >> http://www.ipv6day.org >> >> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or >> confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the >> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware >> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this >> information, including attached files, is prohibited. >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@xxxxxxxx >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------- > Joel Jaeggli (joelja@xxxxxxxxxxx) > GPG Key Fingerprint: > 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2 > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf