On Jul 12, 2006, at 06:03, Dave Crocker wrote:
4. Having a per-meeting special list has an obvious and reasonable
basis.
However it makes each meeting's list a special case for IETF
administration and
for attendees. Possible variations to consider:
a. Have the list name be permanent (such as "ietf-attendees") so
that
recipients can have a filing filter that they create one time.
If the spam filtering is good, or its subscribers-only... otherwise,
per-meeting names with a known, simple pattern (ietf$MEETINGNUM-
attendees?) might be better, if a little harder to match in some
filter software.
d. Automatic subscription to a moderated, low-traffic announcement
list, and optional subscription to a "chat" list for discussions of
cookies, WCs, restaurants, etc.
Ken
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf