Keith Moore wrote:
I also know that others have raised similar issues on the DKIM list
since then, and fairly recently. But the current documents don't
reflect any awareness of those issues or attempt to address
them. That's why I said "not listening".
We have from day one had an issue tracker. Please be specific.
I haven't looked at the issue tracker. I've seen messages that were
posted to the list that were saying much the same things I said at the
BOFs and before the WG was chartered, and I've read the current
documents and seen that the issues are not addressed or acknowledged.
Which is to say that we have a process -- that we've published and
followed --
and you couldn't be bothered to use it. Our issues tracker has been
ridiculously
open to issues too, but still no issues, no specific complaints. The
prerequisite of
listening is utterances somewhat crisper than "Harrumph".
Mike
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf