Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This is simply untrue. The fact that we had running code across multiple
> disparate code bases was offered only as an indication as to the maturity
> of the draft. 

Patently false.  And DKIM has only gained consensus by defining the problem so narrowly as to produce a useless solution.

Keith

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]