On Wed Jun 21 00:36:26 2006, Keith Moore wrote:
As someone who has actually tried producing I-Ds in alternate formats, I'm not sure that I agree that there's much benefit to having only I-Ds use the new format. People who review the document need to be able to see something close to the version that will actually be published.
I would find it interesting if the I-Ds were at least available in their source format as well as their TXT format, though, especially if that was xml2rfc, and it's certainly a more practical zone for experiments about formats than the RFC series itself.
Dave. -- Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx - xmpp:dwd@xxxxxxxxxx - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/ - http://dave.cridland.net/ Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf