> I could not agree with John more on the desirablilty of a tighter definition > of PDF and the reasonableness of "plates in the back". The problem with tightly defining which piece of PDF you will support is that most clients don't give the user choice on what they do. A user gets a "export to PDF" button, but they don't get a "export to PDF/A and make sure all fonts are self-contained and don't include embedded video." Carl _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf