Re: RFC Author Count and IPR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Unfortunately the genesis of some IP is not that easily dealt with - In fact
EACH and EVERY contributor must be named, since their rights to the core
genesis are something that are either defined in an agreement or somethign
for resolution before a trier of fact in some form.

Todd

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vijay Devarapallli" <dvijay@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Bob Braden" <braden@xxxxxxx>
Cc: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; <techspec@xxxxxxxx>; <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>; <ipr-wg@xxxxxxxx>; <rfc-editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: RFC Author Count and IPR


> On 5/24/06, Bob Braden <braden@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >   *> That means if you have unlisted authors who have contributed
> >   *> significant chunks of text, you still need to get their clearance
to
> >   *> do anything interesting with that text.
> >   *>
> >
> > Who decides what constitutes a "significant chunk"?
>
> the primary author (there is always one person who maintains the
> XML source) and the WG chairs?
>
> Vijay
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
>


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]