Joe, > SRV records are not equivalent to either assigned or mutually-negotiated > ports; they would require extra messages, extra round-trip times, and/or > extra services (DNS) beyond what is currently required. > Just to be clear, I am not suggesting that no assignments be done, but that SRV records be used where appropriate. If setup time or circular dependencies are a concern, SRV records may not be appropriate. Eliot _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf