At 02:52 PM 4/06/2006, Steven Blake wrote:
> Your representation as to the document's conclusions is simply not
> supported by the document itself.
Geoff,
I don't understand why you think my paraphrase of your document's
conclusions (including the quoted text above) is unfair or inaccurate.
I am pointing out (again) that the document did not recommend the adoption
of any particular HD ratio value. It is possible that it may be of some
value at this point to read through the document once more in order to
appreciate precisely what is in the document and also to appreciate what is
not in the document, as your comments relating to overall address
consumption and sending "messages" to providers, wrong or otherwise, appear
to be based on material that is simply not contained in this document. It
is not altogether clear to me how your comments are to be considered in the
context of an IETF last call on this particular document in the context of
the IETF process.
regards,
Geoff
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf