*> *> "People should refrain from allowing their passion for precise *> terminology usage to prevent essential communication from *> ever taking place" *> That statement incorporates an assumption that is not true. I vaguely recall that you can prove anything starting from a false premise. Bob Braden *> - is a far cry from - *> *> "Nit-picking is prohibited." Your choice of the emotion-packed word "nit-picking" reveals that you and I cannot have a sensible discussion. Is a bug in a programs a nit? Is bad English grammar a nit? Is ambiguous prose or terminology a nit? Bob Braden _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf