Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 28 mar 2006, at 18.00, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:


From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist [mailto:kurtis@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

NAT is a dead end.  If the Internet does not develop a way
to obsolete
NAT, the Internet will die.  It will gradually be replaced
by networks
that are more-or-less IP based but which only run a small number of
applications, poorly, and expensively.


...or you will see an overlay network build on top of
NAT+IPv4 that abstracts the shortcomings away - aka what the
peer to peer networks are doing. End-to-end addressing...

Precisely. Just what is this fetish about keeping the IP address the same as
the packet travels?

I will have to get better at making irony clearer....I most certainly hope we are not heading down the route I suggest above. I am _afraid_ we are though.

- kurtis -

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]