Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joel Jaeggli writes:

> I find it interesting that our vision is frequently so short-sighted that
> we can't even envision in the course of an arguement the applications that
> are possible today let alone the ones that people will want in the future.

And one consequence of this is that we cannot possibly know today how
to allocate address for the future, which is another reason why
address spaces are exhausted to quickly, no matter how many bits they
contain.  And this in turn is why IPv6 won't last.



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]