"Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > BTW, giving out /64s is one reason why the IPv6 address space will be > exhausted in barely more time than was required to exhaust the IPv4 > address space. This is FUD. Care to back up your assertions with real analysis? You might want to review (among other things): http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-50/presentations/ripe50-plenary-wed-ipv6-roundtable-report.pdf Thomas _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf