Re: Meeting format (Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For what it's worth, this approach seemed to work reasonably well for the SIP P2P BOF + ad-hoc (or "interim") meeting. The former was on Tuesday, the latter on Friday afternoon.

Dave Crocker wrote:

(IMO, BOFs should be early in the week, not on Friday.
Cross-area review of new ideas is just as important as
anything else.)


This is an interesting suggestion.

Any meeting that is early in the week gets the benefit of follow-on hallways discussions, during the rest of the week. However BOFs are a specific class of meetings that tend to need this more than most.

BOFs are trying to gain interest and even a good BOF will tend to engender some fuzziness, with resulting efforts at clarification. This often benefits most from the combinations of smaller discussions that are so common during IETF meetings.

d/

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]