That will be correct if they are really US sponsors, which don't seem to be the case most of the time. Regards, Jordi > De: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx> > Responder a: <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> > Fecha: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:49:16 -0500 > Para: <jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > Asunto: Re: Making IETF happening in different regions > >> So you mean you think is reasonable and fair going for the cheapest even if >> every time more and more people can't attend because a government decides >> not to grant visas ? > > you're conflating two problems - cost and immigration laws. > > having fewer meetings in the US is a reasonable response to US > immigration law. asking US sponsors to pay for the additional cost of > holding those meetings outside of the US is not reasonable. > > Keith > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit Slides available at: http://www.ipv6-es.com This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf