Re: Suggestion on a BCP specific WG...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




todd glassey wrote:
> Response-
> 
> No Joel - you are dead wrong IMHO. The IETF doesnt get to redefine the
> Industry Term BCP to mean 'some document we publish'.

We use the term "Request for Comments" when after last call for input.

We use the term "Standard" when we have no official compliance process.

We are not industry, we are the IETF ;-)

What we mean when we use the term BCP - and have for a number of years -
is our decision, as with Standard or anything else.

Joe

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]